Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Yogendra Pal Dubey v. Basic Shiksha Adhikari Mainpuri & Others - WRIT - A No. 30585 of 2001 [2004] RD-AH 1091 (7 October 2004)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court No. 26

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.30585 of 2001

Yogendra Pal Dubey           Vs. Basic Shiksha Adhikari Mainpuri and others


Hon'ble Vikram Nath J.

This writ petition has been filed with a direction to the respondent no. l to pay an amount of Rs.80000/- still due from the General Provident Fund account of the petitioner, pay the difference of salary and computation pension along with highest interest to the petitioner.

Heard Sri Anil Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.K. Sharma learned counsel representing the respondent no.2.

In paragraph 9 of the counter affidavit it has been stated that all the post retirement benefits due to the petitioner have been paid and no further entitlement was due to the petitioner. The petitioner has filed rejoinder affidavit. He has annexed the complete chart running into several pages regarding the deposits made in the General Provident Fund account. (Annexure-1 to the rejoinder affidavit). According to the said statement of account an amount of Rs.88778/- is still due to the petitioner from his G.P.F. account. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the respondent no. l along with relevant materials to establish the arrears due to him from the G.P.F. account. Respondent no. l will verify from the original records the furnished by the petitioner. In case any amount is found to be due from the G.P.F. account of the petitioner, the same shall be determined and paid within two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that the petitioner will cooperate with the respondent no. l in this matter.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed off.

Dt. 7.10.2004



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.