Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABAJI ALIAS RISHIPAL AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Babaji alias Rishipal and another v. State of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5240 of 2004 [2004] RD-AH 1092 (8 October 2004)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble R.C.Deepak, J.

Heard Sri P.N. Mishra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Apul Mishra, learned counsel for the accused-appellants, Sri Jitendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the informant/complainant, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State and perused the judgment.

It is contented by the learned counsel for the accused-appellants that three persons allegedly were going on the same scooter. Two persons (deceased) have been done to death, but the informant did sustain even no scratch whereas he was equally inimical to the accused-appellants. He further submits that the presence of prosecution witness Dharamveer also becomes doubtful, as it is alleged that he grazing the cattle nearby the spot away from 1 kilometer from his residence. The accused-appellants had been on bail during trial and they had not misused the privileges granted to them.  There is no possibility that the appeal be heard in the near future.

Considering the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, as stated above, but without expressing any opinion of their arguments on merit, the appeal is admitted.

Issue notice.  

Appellants Babaji alias Rishipal and Sushil convicted  under Sections  302/34 IPC in S. T. No. 850 of 1993 shall be released on bail on their  furnishing  a  personal  bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned.

The realization of fine shall also remain stayed during the pendency of their appeal before this Hon'ble Court.

Dated: 8.10.2004

MH/5240


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.