High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Bramh Singh alias Bramhchari and others v. State of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5327 of 2004  RD-AH 1157 (14 October 2004)
Hon'ble R.C.Deepak, J.
Heard Sri Dharmendra Singhal, learned counsel for the accused-appellants, Sri M.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State and perused the judgment.
The learned counsel for the accused-appellants submit that the accused-appellants no.2, 3 & 4 named Tejpal, Gullu and Prakash did cause no injury to the injured. They had been on bail during trial and they had not misused the privileges of bail granted to them.
Considering the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, as stated above, but without expressing any opinion of their arguments on merit, the appeal is admitted.
Appellants Tejpal, Gullu and Prakash convicted under Sections 307/34 IPC in Sessions Trial No. 509 of 1995 shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned.
The realization of fine imposed upon the accused-appellants Tejpal, Gullu and Prakash shall also remain stayed during the pendency of their appeal before this Hon'ble Court.
Summon the Trial Court's record.
List on 16th November, 2004.
The prayer for bail of the accused-appellant no.1 Bramh Singh alias Bramhchari shall be considered after the receipt of the Trial Court's record.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.