High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Jitendra Seth Ex-corporator Nagar Nigam v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Nagar Vikas & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 47838 of 2004  RD-AH 1366 (9 November 2004)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh, J.
Hon'ble V.S.Bajpai, J.
According to the petitioner, the plot Nos. 69A and 69B are ponds and yet respondent No.6 has held that they are not Nazul property. He has also filed representation on 2.9.2004 before respondent No.2 as it has not been decided has been filed the present writ petition.
In the circumstances of the case it would be appropriate that the petitioner' application dated 2.9.2004 may be decided by respondent no.2 by a reasoned order at an early date, and if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner alongwith certified copy of this order will also file a copy of his aforesaid application, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope. Respondent No.2 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
With these directions the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.