Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECRETARY DEPTT. OF REVENUE & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohammad Arif v. State Of U.P. Thru. Secretary Deptt. Of Revenue & Others - WRIT - A No. 12741 of 2004 [2004] RD-AH 180 (31 March 2004)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.  

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a direction to the respondents to pass necessary orders on the petitioner's applications dated 15.9.1999 and 1.10.1999 (Annexures 9 and 10 respectively to the writ petition) for his appointment on the post of Collection Amin/Seasonal Collection Amin.

It is urged by Sri B.P.Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the petitioner is an O.B.C. and is eligible for being appointed as an Amin/Seasonal Collection Amin as he has worked as such for more than four Faslis continuously. In support of his submission the petitioner has filed experience certificate issued by the Tehsildar.  The counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has made a representation for appointment on the post of Collection Amin/Seasonal Collection Amin which has remained unactioned by the District Magistrate, Moradabad till date.

The only prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner at this stage is for issuance of a direction to respondent no. 2 to decide his representation within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.

For the reasons stated above this petition is disposed of with the direction to the District Magistrate that he shall decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned/speaking order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him by the petitioner. No order as to costs.  

Dated: 31-3-2004

Rpk/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.