Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHD. MOVEEN versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohd. Moveen v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 7610 of 2004 [2004] RD-AH 84 (23 February 2004)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

                                                                                                    Court no.21

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 7610 of 2004

Mohd. Moveen           Versus                 State of U.P. and others

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari,J.

Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

The respondent no.3 advertised  14 posts of Junior Clerk and 2 posts of Stenographer  to be filled by  candidates belonging to ''Backward classes' under backlog quota through Newspaper ''Amar Ujala'. The petitioner applied for the  post  Junior Clerk and was declared duly selected  and his name was at sl. No. 16 in the merit list. It is alleged that the candidates at sl. Nos. 1 to 14 in the merit list were issued appointment letters against 14 advertised posts of Junior Clerk. The candidates at sl. Nos. 15 to 18 were kept in waiting list. It is alleged that on 30.6.2003 another merit list of Stenographer belonging to Backward classes was declared. One candidate Mr. Ranjeet Singh whose name was at sl. No.11 in the merit list of Junior clerk has also been selected for the post of Stenographer. He has preferred to join  the post of Stenographer and dropped the claim over the post of Junior Clerk. Consequently, the post vacated by Sri Ranjeet Singh  was given to Km. Manju whose name was at sl. No. 15 in the  waiting list and she has joined the post on the basis of appointment letter dated 2.8.2003.  Another candidate Sri Kamar Alam whose name was at sl. No.4 in the aforesaid list of Junior Clerk voluntarily resigned from the post of Junior Clerk on 16.7.2003. On 21.8.2003 the resignation of Sri Kamar Alam was accepted by respondent no.3 .  On 22.9.2003 on the personal request of the petitioner respondent no.3 wrote a letter to respondent no.4 for seeking permission of appointment on two vacant posts of Junior Clerk  (one for Scheduled Caste and other for candidate belonging to Backward caste).

In the mean time, a ban was imposed by the State Government  on recruitment on 29.8.2003. The aforesaid ban was lifted on 15.1.2004 by the State Government. The petitioner  moved a representation dated 4.2.2004 in this regard before respondent no.3 but till date, no order has been passed by respondent no.3.

The aforesaid  representation of the petitioner  is still pending.  The ban having been lifted, for the reasons stated above, respondent no.4 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 4.2.2004 by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as cost.

Dated 23.2.2004

CPP/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.