MOHD. NASIM versus STATE OF U.P.& OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Mohd. Nasim v. State Of U.P.& Others - WRIT - C No. 476 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 118 (7 January 2005)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Writ Petition No. 476 of 2005

HON'BLE YATIDNRA SINGH, J.

HON'BLE V.S. BAJPAI, J.

1.  This writ petition is for direction to the respondent to make payment for works done and goods supplied.

2. We have heard counsel for petitioner and standing counsel for the respondents.

3. In the circumstances of the case, the petitioner may file representation before respondent no. 4.  In case any such representation is filed, it may be decided by respondent no. 4 by a speaking order, if possible, within three-months  from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file certified copy of this order; other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with the representation.  Respondent no. 4 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.  

4. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.  

Dated: 7.1.2005

SKS  

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.