Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANGE KHAN versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mange Khan v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 61593 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 18 (1 January 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

HON. ARUN TANDON, J.

Heard Sri Irfan Chaudhary, Advocate on behalf of petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4.

The petitioner, Mange Khan, who was appointed as Seasonal Collection Peon, seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to offer seasonal work to the petitioner, strictly, in accordance with the seniority of the seasonal collection peon working in District Muzaffarnagar. It is pointed out that w.e.f. 22.8.2005 seasonal work has been refused to the petitioner while person junior to the petitioner are being offered such seasonal work. The petitioner in that regard has made a detailed representation before the authority concerned, which has gone unattended. Hence the present writ petition.

In the facts and circumstances of the case it would be in the interest of justice, if the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation along with a certified copy of this order, ventilating all his grievances before the District Magistrate/Collector, Muzaffarnagar (respondent no.2) within two weeks from today. On such representation being made the District Magistrate (respondent no.2) shall  consider and decide the  same, strictly in accordance with law, preferably, within four weeks from the date the representation is so made. The District Magistrate (respondent no.2) shall pass a reasoned speaking order.

This Court has no room to doubt that the seasonal work shall offered to the seasonal collection peons strictly in accordance with the seniority maintained for the said purpose.

With the aforesaid directions the writ petition is disposed of finally.  

19.9.2005

Pkb/61593


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.