Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SONU versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sonu v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 9365 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 1869 (9 August 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Reserved

Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9365 of 2005

Sonu ...Vs....... State of U.P.

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard Sri Vashistha Tiwari learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.

From the perusal of the record it reveals that in the present case the alleged occurrence has taken place on 2.9.2004,in which it was alleged that co-accused Sunil and applicant Sonu had taken a loan of Rs. 2000/- each from Smt Radha Rani the mother of the first informant  prior to six months  to the alleged occurrence, but he same amount was not returned by them on demand of the first informant and her mother. The applicant and co-accused Sunil became annoyed  and felt insult when the demand of return of the above loan was placed publicly before them. On the date of alleged occurrence at about 2.15 p.m. the applicant and co-accused Sunil surrounded the injured Smt Radha Rani and discharged five or six shots by their firearms with an intention to commit her murder. Consequently, she received injuries and fell down. The first informant and witness Vinod escaped their life  by running away from there. The injured was admitted in the hospital from where she was referred to Aligarh. The medical examination report shows that injured had received nine injuries caused by firearms, in which injuries no. 1, 4, 6 and 7 were grievous in nature and some of the injuries were on vital parts of the body.  The prosecution story is fully corroborated by medical evidence. The F.I.R. was promptly lodged. The witnesses were present at the alleged occurrence.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and  and without expressing

any opinion on the merits of the case, I find that it is not a fit case for bail at this stage.

Accordingly, the bail application  is rejected at this stage.

Dated: 09.8.2005.

Rcv


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.