Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAVI NARAIN GUPTA versus U.P.S.R.T.C. THRU CHAIRMAN

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ravi Narain Gupta v. U.P.S.R.T.C. Thru Chairman-Cum-M.D. And Others - WRIT - A No. 55921 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 1991 (18 August 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.

Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

The grievance of the petitioner, who was a Senior Clerk in the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Kanpur Nagar, is that though he retired from service after attaining the age of superannuation on 31.10.1998, yet he has not been paid his post-retiral benefits including Leave Encashment and Arrears of difference in wage fixation under the Vth Pay Commission recommendations despite submitting representation after representation for payment of the same.

According to him the amount of Leave Encashment payable to him is Rs. 13,824/- and the Arrears of difference in wage fixation comes to Rs. 27,677/-.

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay his post-retiral benefits of Leave Encashment and Arrears of difference in wage fixation under the Vth Pay Commission with interest.

An ad-interim mandamus is issued to respondent no. 2 to pay the aforesaid post-retiral benefits of the petitioner within a period of one month from today with compound interest at the rate of 10% half yearly till the entire payment is made. The respondents shall also file counter affidavit within the aforesaid period of one month. If the aforesaid payment is not made or cause is not shown, respondent no. 2 shall personally appear before this Court on 19.9.2005.

List this case on 19.9.2005.

Dated: 18.8.2005

Rpk/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.