High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Arvind Agarwal v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Industrial Devlp. & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 52118 of 2004  RD-AH 2002 (22 August 2005)
WP No. 52118 of 2004
HON'BLE YATINDRA SINGH, J.
HON'BLE R.K. RASTOGI, J.
1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Standing counsel for the respondents.
2. According to the petitioner, he has filed an application for grant of mining lease on 8.8.2003 before respondent no.2. As it has not been decided he has filed the present writ petition.
3. In the circumstances of the case it would be appropriate that the petitioner's application dated 8.8.2003 may be decided by the concerned respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, and if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner alongwith certified copy of this order will also file a copy of his aforesaid application, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope. The concerned respondent after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
4. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.