High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Bedi Yadav v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 58142 of 2005  RD-AH 2216 (1 September 2005)
Hon'ble Amitava Lala, J.
Hon'ble Prakash Krishna, J.
The petitioner has made representation jointly with the others which has not been disposed of as yet. Upon being frustrated the petitioner invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court to get consideration of his representation in connection with seniority. However, upon hearing the parties we are of the view that there can not be embargo upon the authority concerned in deciding the case/representation of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order by giving fullest opportunity of hearing and by passing a reasoned order thereon. Accordingly, such order is passed herein. For the purpose of effective adjudication a copy of the writ petition along with its annexures can also be treated as part and parcel of the representation.
Thus, the writ petition stands disposed of.
However, no order is passed as to cost.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.