Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U. P. LUCKNOW versus S/S BAREILLY RAB UDYOG, BAREILLY.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Commissioner of Sales Tax, U. P. Lucknow v. S/S Bareilly Rab Udyog, Bareilly. - SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. 296 of 1992 [2005] RD-AH 2393 (6 September 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court no. 55

Sales Tax Revision no. 296 of 1992.

Commissioner of Sales Tax, U. P. Lucknow. ...Applicant.

Vs

S/S Bareilly Rab Udyog, Bareilly. ... Opposite party.

Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.

The present revision under Section 11 of U. P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "Act") is directed against the order of Tribunal dated 24.10.1991 relating to assessment year 1983-84 under the U. P. Sales Tax Act.

Heard Counsel for the parties.

Assessing Authority estimated the turnover of Bhusi at Rs.50,000/-.  First Appellate Authority held that the Assessing Officer had not stated whether the Bhusi was of rice or paddy, however, treating it as a rice husk and has confirmed the levy of tax on theestimated turnover of Rs.20,000/-.    Tribunal held that the paddy and rice husk are the two different commodities.  Tribunal further held that rice husk is used for extraction oil while the paddy husk is used for Cattle fodder and is not liable to tax.  Claim of dealer was that the Bhusi, which was purchased, was the Cattle fodder, therefore, is not liable to tax, has been accepted by the Tribunal.  I do not find any error in the order of Tribunal.  The disputed amount of tax involved in the present case, is meager, no interference is called for.

In the result, revision fails, and is, accordingly, dismissed.

Dt:06.9.2005.

MZ/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.