Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JAGDISH CHANDRA versus DY DIRECTOR (ADMN.) RAJYA KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI PARISHAD & OR

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jagdish Chandra v. Dy Director (admn.) Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad & Or - SPECIAL APPEAL No. 61 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 246 (25 January 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 32

Special Appeal No. 61 of 2005

Jagdish Chandra           Vs.     Dy Director(Administration) Rajya Krishi

      Utpadan Mandi Parishad,U.P.Bareilly

      And others.

                                    .......

Hon'ble S.Rafat Alam A.C.J.

Hon'ble Vikram  Nath J.

This Special appeal is against the order of learned single Judge dated 21.12.2004 in Writ Petition No. 54708 of 2004.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

By the impugned order dated 23.11.2004 a proceeding is initiated against the appellant. During the pendency of that proceeding he has been attached to the Mandi Samiti Bisauli district Budaun. It is urged that the appellant being a class IV employee cannot be transferred in view of Rule 24(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Produce Market Committees (Centralised) Services Regulations, 1991. We do not find any force in the submission. The aforesaid Rule 24(2) provides that the Director or Addl. Director or the Regional Deputy Director can transfer any Mandi Sahayak from one market committee to another market committee within the region or any member of the service holding  group-D post other than Mandi Sahayak( Kamdar) from one market committee to another market committee within the district.

Admittedly, the appellant is working as Mandi Sahayak in Mandi Samiti Bareilly from where he has been attached to adjoining Mandi Samiti, Bisauli which is within the region on account of pendency of enquiry. Thus the learned single Judge has rightly did not interfere in the impugned order and dismissed the writ petition.

This appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dt. 25.01.2005

Hsc/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.