Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BADLA SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Badla Singh v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 59709 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 2519 (8 September 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J

Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Learned Standing Counsel for Respondent no.1 and Sri R.D.Khare for Respondent nos. 2 to 4. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 18.8.2005 passed by Respondent no.4 whereby he has been transferred from one division to another within the district of  Bulandshahr. The contention of the petitioner is that the said order has been passed in violation of the own transfer policy of the respondent-Corporation as has been framed under the directions of the Apex Court dated 24.2.2005 issued in the case of  Suresh Chandra Sharma vs. Chairman, U.P.S.E.B. (writ petition no.79 of 1997).

Having regard to the aforesaid submission this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that with regard to such grievance the petitioner may file a comprehensive representation before the Respondent no.5 who shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, after considering the case of the petitioner in terms of the transfer policy dated 30.5.2005. However, this order shall not be construed to mean that  the operation of the impugned order is being stayed.

With the aforesaid observation this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to cost.

Dt/-8.9.005

dps

w.p. 59709.05


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.