Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Gulab Chand Bajpai v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 59775 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 2528 (8 September 2005)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J

Heard Sri Shivendra Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for Respondent no.1 and Sri A.C.Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for Respondent no. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of finally without calling for a counter affidavit.

It is the case of the petitioner that he was an employee of the respondent-Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar. He retired from the service on 31.3.2001.  It has been submitted that after having completed all formalities with regard to payment of pension and other retiral dues, the pension book of the petitioner had been prepared, according to which he was found entitled to payment of Rs.1694/- per month as pension besides other retiral dues, which have yet not been paid despite the petitioner having filed several representations in this regard. It has further been submitted that payment of pension as well as other retiral dues is the statutory right of a retired employee which is not paid as a grace or bounty.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties as well as with their consent and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the Nagar Ayukt, Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar, Respondent No. 2, along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said respondent in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the same.

It is further provided that in case if the petitioner is found entitled to payment of any amount, the same shall be paid to him within two months from the date of decision on the representation of the petitioner, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to payment of 9% interest from the date of his retirement till the date of actual payment.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs.



w.p. 59775.05


Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.