Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ISHWAR PRASAD versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ishwar Prasad v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 59456 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 2531 (8 September 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents no. 1 and 2. Considering the nature of the order which is being passed, notices to respondent no. 3 are not being issued and this writ petition is being disposed of finally. In case if the said respondent no. 3 is so aggrieved, he shall be at liberty to file an application for modification, variation and/or recall of this order.

It is the case of the petitioner that he retired from the service of the respondent-Nagar Palika Parishad, district Jaunpur on 31.7.1999. It has been submitted that after his retirement the petitioner has been paid his post retiral dues only in part but his entire dues have yet not been paid despite the petitioner having filed several representations in this regard.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction that in case if, with regard to his grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before respondent no. 3, the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Shahganj, district Jaunpur alongwith a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the said respondent in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the same.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

Dt/-8.9.2005

ps

w.p.59456.05


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.