Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURESH CHANDRA SHARMA versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECY. MINISTRY OF REVENUE & ORS.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Suresh Chandra Sharma v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Ministry Of Revenue & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 54623 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 2932 (15 September 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

W.P. No.54623/05

W.P. No. 20669/05

W.P. No.55004/04

W.P. No.47361/05

W.P.No.2666218/05

W.P. No.26218/05

Hon'ble  Yatindra Singh,J

Hon'ble  R.K.Rastogi,J

Writ Petition  No. 54623/05

Notices on behalf of  respondents  no. 1 to 4 have been accepted  by the Standing Counsel, notice on behalf of  respondent no.5 has  been accepted by Sri Punit Kumar Gupta and Sri W.H.Khan, notice on behalf  of respondent no.6 has been accepted by  Sri  Ajit Kumar  and notice  on behalf of  respondent no. 7 has been accepted by   Sri S.S. Nigam. They pray  and are granted  ten days' time to file counter affidavit  and one week thereafter  to file rejoinder affidavit.

Writ Petition No.20669/05

The petitioner has filed  an application  for amendment   of the  writ petition. This application is allowed. The amendments may be carried out  within three days. The respondents, who have already filed counter affidavit  to the writ petition , may file supplementary     counter affidavit to the

amended writ petition  and others  may file  counter affidavit  to the  amended  writ petition  within ten days and  one week thereafter is granted to file   rejoinder affidavit or supplementary  rejoinder affidavit as the case may be.

Writ Petition No. 55004/04

In this writ petition  the petitioner has  also filed an application  for impleadment  of Sri Suresh Chandra  Sharma and  Riddhi Siddhi Portfolio Management Services Private Limited  as respondents no. 6 and 7. The application  for impleadment and  the  amendment  is  allowed. The petitioner may  carry out  amendments within three days.

Mr. K.M.Garg  has accepted notice on behalf of  respondent no.6 and Mr. Punit  Kumar Gupta  has accepted notice on behalf of  respondent no.7. The parties, who have  already filed  counter affidavit  to the writ petition, may file supplementary  counter affidavit  and others may  file counter affidavit within ten days to the amended  writ petition. A week thereafter is granted to file   supplementary rejoinder affidavit or rejoinder affidavit  as the case may be.

On the joint request of   parties, list this case  alongwith the  connected cases on 6.10.2005.

14.9.2005

MLK


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.