High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
M/s Vaishno Enterprises Thru' Prop. v. State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secy. & Anr. - WRIT - C No. 6374 of 2005  RD-AH 391 (11 February 2005)
WP NO. 6374 OF 2005
HON'BLE YATIDNRA SINGH, J.
HON'BLE R.K. RASTOGI, J.
1. This writ petition is for a direction to respondents to make payment for the work completed by the petitioner.
2. We have heard counsel for petitioner and standing counsel and Sri AK Ray for the respondents.
3. In the circumstances of the case, the petitioner may file representation before respondent no. 2. In case any such representation is filed, it may be decided by respondent no. 2 by a speaking order, if possible, within three-months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file certified copy of this order; other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with the representation. Respondent no. 2 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
4. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.