High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Sushil Kumar v. Managing Director U.P.F.C. & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 64673 of 2005  RD-AH 4027 (4 October 2005)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
The respondent no. 4 had taken loan for construction of Banquet Hall from the U.P. Financial Corporation, Saharanpur (the UPFC). The petitioner is a guarantor for the loan. When the respondent no. 4 could not pay the loan the Corporation started recovery proceedings. Subsequently, the Corporation permitted respondent no.4 to sell the Banquet Hall which was security for payment of the loan. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying that instead of respondent no. 4 the petitioner may be permitted to sell the property or he should also be involved in sale of the Banquet Hall.
We have heard counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Satish Chaturvedi for respondents 1 to 3.
In the circumstances, it will be appropriate that the petitioner may file a fresh representation before respondent no.1. In case the representation is filed, the same may be decided by the said respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, if possible, within three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file a certified copy of this order; necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope along with the representation. The concerned authority after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.