Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ALIGARH GRAMIN BANK versus ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Aligarh Gramin Bank v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I & Another - WRIT TAX No. 1385 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 4091 (6 October 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 10

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1385 of 2005

Aligarh Gramin Bank Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Range,

                                         Aligarh and another

Hon'ble A.K. Yog, J.

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J.

Heard Sri Ravi Kant, Senior Advocate along with Sri Shakeel Ahmad, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Dhananjay Awasthai, Advocate on behalf of the Department/Respondents.

Since all the respondents are represented, no notice need be sent. It is agreed by the learned counsels for the parties at the Bar that writ petition itself may be finally decided without waiting for the counter affidavit since the petition raises simple question of law based upon reading of the impugned notice/order dated 14-9-2005 and 21-9-2005/Annexures-4 and 5 respectively to the writ petition, pertaining to assessment year 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1997-98 to 2004-05.

Bare reading of the notice/order dated 21-9-2005 clearly reflects that it is not a case of escaped income or rectification which may fall within the expression ''mistake apparent from the record'. Reading of the impugned notice shows that the Assessing Officer wants to change the opinion which is not permissible in law.

Consequently, the impugned notice/order dated 14-9-2005 and 21-9-2005/ Annexures-4 and 5 respectively to the writ petition are hereby quashed. It is, however, made clear that the appeal pending before the concerned authority, with respect to the aforesaid assessment years, under Income Tax Act, if any, may be heard and decided expeditiously.

Writ Petition stands allowed.

No order as to costs.

Copy of this order may be issued to the learned counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges today itself.

Dated: 6-10-2005/ALS


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.