Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. CHANDA versus STATE OF UP THRU' SECY. NAGAR VIKAS AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Chanda v. State Of Up Thru' Secy. Nagar Vikas And Others - WRIT - A No. 66502 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 4448 (19 October 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari ,J.

        Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

       It is not denied by the respondents that          the petitioner retired from service on 31.7.2003 from Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar and that she has been paid the retiral dues. According to Government Order dated 13th December, 1977 the pension papers of a retired employee should be prepared and sent to the authority concerned for sanction of pension and retiral dues etc.  before six months from the date of his retirement  

        The controversy of the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the ratio laid down in Civil Misc. Writ No.21297 of 2004 Rasheed Ali  Vs.State of U.P. and others  decided on 20.9.2005.

          In the circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this writ petition pending, hence this petition is being decided without calling for counter affidavit.

     In view of ratio decided in Rasheed Ali''s case (supra) this writ petition is allowed with the direction that respondent nos. 2 and 3 will ensure payment of arrears of pension and retiral dues of the petitioner with compound interest at the rate of 10% per annum within a period of two months from today and shall further make payment of her pension month to month as and when it falls due. In case of default the recovery shall be made from the erring officials as arrears of land revenue within one month thereafter and shall be paid to the petitioner forthwith within a week of its recovery. Cost is assessed as Rs. 5000/- on respondent nos. 2 and 3 to be paid to the petitioner within a month for not taking action for payment of pension and other retiral dues within time in accordance with the G.O. dated 13.12.77 and in making the poor employee run from pillar to post for her retiral benefits without any just cause.

Dated 19.10.2005

CPP/-66502-2005


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.