Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM PRAVESH PAL versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Pravesh Pal v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4020 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 4613 (21 October 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

Supplementary affidavit filed today be taken on record.

Accused applicant Ram Pravesh Pal son of Dukhi Pal has prayed for release on bail in case crime No. 493 of 2004 under Sections 498-A, 304 B IPC and Section 3/4 D. P. Act, P. S. Kukhundoo, District Deoria.

Prosecution case is that Smt. Bindra was married to the accused applicant about three years prior to the incident according to Hindu rites. Gauna took place in May 2004. The accused had been demanding Rs. 10,000/- and when this amount could not be given Smt. Bindra was ill treated and harassed. The complainant was informed on 9.9.2004 at about3 p.m. that his daughter was ill. When he was going to her in-law house, he saw the accused and others coming in Tractor Trauli and the complainant found that there was dead body of his daughter in the Trauli. He went to inform his sister and when he returned he found that dead body was at the cremation ground.

Post mortem report shows that cause of death could not be ascertained and viscera was preserved. No other injury was found on the body. The applicant has filed the copy of chemical examiner and it shows that no chemical poison was found in the Viscera part.

Learned counsel for the accused applicant has contended that applicant has been wrongly implicated in this case and that Smt. Bindra died a natural death.

In the circumstances of the case and the facts as have come on record accused is entitled to bail.

Let the accused involved in above noted case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dated: 21.10.2005

RKS/4020/05


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.