Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ARUN KUMAR & OTHERS versus CANE COMMISSIONER, U.P., LUCKNOW & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Arun Kumar & Others v. Cane Commissioner, U.P., Lucknow & Others - WRIT - A No. 8970 of 2002 [2005] RD-AH 4861 (26 October 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Tarun Agarwala,J.

The petitioner alleges that he has not been allowed to join as a Seasonal Clerk at Cooperative  Cane Development Department, Modi Nagar. In  my opinion, the petitioner should approach the authority concerned and move an appropriate  representation which  will be considered and decided by the authority concerned, by a reasoned and speaking order, within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Dated: 26.10.2005

AKJ(WP 8970/02)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.