Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJESH KUMAR VERMA versus ADHYAKSH U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajesh Kumar Verma v. Adhyaksh U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. & Others - WRIT - C No. 52327 of 2004 [2005] RD-AH 490 (22 February 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Writ Petition No. 52327 of 2004

HON'BLE YATINDRA SINGH, J.

HON'BLE R.K. RASTOGI, J.

1. This is a writ petition for a direction to respondent to connect the electricity line of the petitioner and to quash the assessment of electricity bill.

2. We have heard counsel for petitioner and Sri WH Khan, counsel for the respondents. This court has granted an interim order on 14.12.2004 on deposit of certain amount of money. The order indicates that amount has been deposited and petitioner states that electricity has already been connected. The only question is regarding the disputed amount of the bill.

3. In the circumstances of the case, the petitioner may file his objection before respondent no. 1 against the assessment of his bill within three weeks. Thereafter  respondent no.1 may expeditiously decide his objection by a speaking order, if possible, within three  months from the date of receipt of the objection. The petitioner will file a certified copy of this order; necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with his objection.  Respondent no.1 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner. Needless to add as there is already an interim order by this court, till the objection of the petitioner is decided his electricity will not be disconnected. In case the petitioner does not file his objection within three weeks, then it will be open to respondent to realise the remaining amount.

4. With these directions the writ petition is disposed of.  

Date: 23.2.2005

BBL


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.