Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GIRDHAR GOPAL SAHNEY versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Girdhar Gopal Sahney v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 49004 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 4998 (27 October 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J

         

        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri V.K. Dixit for the respondents and perused the record.

The petitioner- a Security Guard in Zila Panchayat, Pilibhit has come up in this writ petition with the prayer for direction to the respondents to issue appointment letter to the post of Security Guard and to pay him the salary payable to the regularly appointed Security Guards , month by month and other consequential benefits.

A daily wager has no right for regularization of his services and this Court cannot direct for regularization of  services of the petitioners in view of the decision of Hon'ble the Apex court in State of Punjab and others Vs. Sardara Singh- (1998)9 SCC-709.  Engagement of petitioner on daily wage basis does not confer any legal right for regularization of his services.    It is not feasible in the writ jurisdiction to take evidence and decide the matter merely on the basis of  affidavits. Direction for payment of salary to the petitioner at par with regularly appointed Security Guards cannot be issued by this Court in view of Sardara Singh ''s decision  (supra).

         The petitioner has an effective, efficacious and alternative remedy before the Labour Court as has been held in Basant Lal Vs. U.P. State Roadways Transport Corporation and others (2003) 1 U.P.L.B.E.C. 154. It has been the consistent view of Hon'ble the Supreme Court that wherever an alternative remedy is available, it should not be bypassed and the petitioner has to approach this court after availing alternative remedy.

          The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. In case the petitioner raises an industrial dispute, the same may be decided expeditiously. No order as to costs.

Dt. 27.10.2005

Kkb


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.