Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LAKHAN AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Lakhan And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20196 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 5012 (27 October 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

Heard learned counsel for the accused applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

Accused applicants Lakhan and Kalloo both sons of Ramza Dhimer have prayed for release on bail in case Crime NO. 88 of 2005, under Section 304 IPC, Police Station Panwari, District Mahoba.

According to prosecution case on 11.2.2005, Chaitu @ Chet Ram, Mangal Singh sons of Moti lal and the brother of the complainant were returning from their field at that time Chaitu had his country made gun in his hand. When they reached near the house of Lakhan Dhimer, Chaitu said to Lakhan that "?khejksa D;k dj jgs gks". Then Lakhan asked him to mind his language; on that Chaitu started abusing and Lakhan asked him not to abuse. At that time Chaitu hit them with the butt of the gun. Thereafter  accused along with co accused Chattu son of Lakhan Dhimer gave Kulhari blows to deceased Chaitu, who died as a result thereof.

Post mortem report shows that deceased received incised wounds.

Learned counsel for the accused applicant has contended that it is a case of sudden provocation and provocation was given by the deceased himself as he was abused and then gave butt blows. He has further contended that deceased was criminal and has filed list of 23 cases involving the deceased.

In the circumstances of the case but without prejudice to the merits of the case, accused is entitled to bail.

Let the accused involved in above case crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

The applicant shall furnish an undertaking also before the C.J.M. concerned that he will not indulge in any criminal activity and will not cause either any threat or any physical violence to the complainant and the witnesses and their family members. If any such report is made by any of the above person either to the Court or the police, it shall be properly inquired into and if any substance therein is found, it shall be open for the court below to report to this Court so that his bail may be cancelled.

Dated: 27.10.2005

RKS/20196/05


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.