High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Suheb v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4785 of 2005  RD-AH 5072 (27 October 2005)
Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No. 4785 of 2005
..... vs. .....
State of U. P. Opposite party.
HON. K.N. SINHA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
This is second bail application. The first bail application was rejected by a detailed order dated 31.1.2005. Learned counsel for the applicant has almost argued all those points about the F.I.R., postmortem report and inquest report. All these points were already available at the time of arguments of the first bail application. The points already argued are available on record and not argued, cannot be re-agitated in the matter of bail application. The order rejecting the bail application can be varied only on the existence of fresh ground. If the same grounds are re-agitated again and again there would be no end to the bail application, if once it is rejected.
In the present bail application, no fresh ground exists and it is hereby rejected.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.