High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
R.K. Arora, Proprietor Firm M/S Paras Agencies v. State Of U.P. And Another - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 16060 of 2005  RD-AH 5443 (9 November 2005)
HON�??BLE K.N. SINHA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
It appears that the applicant was an accused in a case of Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. He obtained bail and thereafter did not appear in the court at the time of trial. The court issued various processes, which went unheeded. Notice to sureties was issued and sureties also could not produce the accused, hence proceedings under section 446 Cr.P.C. was registered and initiated. The sureties appeared and sought time to produce the accused.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that accused did not appear because the court was vacant for long time. In my opinion, it is not the concern of the accused. He ought to appear before the court whether it is vacant or working.
I have perused the whole of the order sheet. There does not appear to be any miscarriage of justice in the impugned order. I do not find any ground for quashing of the impugned orders. The application under section 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby dismissed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.