Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PRAVEEN KUMAR DIXIT versus STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Praveen Kumar Dixit v. State Of U.P. & Another - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 11310 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 5545 (10 November 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble R.C.Deepak, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.  

The petitioner has not challenged the findings of the judgment recorded on merit with regard to the award of maintenance allowance, but has submitted that he is working as assistant driver in railway department and he is ready to deposit the entire amount of maintenance allowance, but some reasonable time be granted for this purpose, as he is at present not in a position to deposit the entire amount. But he is paying Rs.2000/- per month as maintenance allowance regularly to respondent concerned.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to deposit Rs.35,000/- as a part of arrears of maintenance allowance within a period of two weeks from today and the remaining arrears of maintenance allowance within six weeks thereafter i.e. half of the remaining arrears within two weeks and the remaining half within four weeks thereafter, but he shall continue to pay Rs.2000/- per month as maintenance allowance in this regard. The money shall be deposited with the court below and the court below shall release the said amount in favour of respondent no.2 Smt. Meera @ Geeta Dixit. In case of failure in complying with the order so passed, the court concerned shall initiate coercive measure to recover the amount forthwith.

The present petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Dt/- 10th November, 2005  

PKG/4 (11310/05)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.