Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Sita Ram And Other v. State - CRIMINAL REVISION No. 353 of 1985 [2005] RD-AH 5565 (10 November 2005)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).



Criminal Revision No.353 of 1985

Sita Ram and others.............................Revisionists.


State of U.P .................. ...................... Respondent.


Heard learned counsel for the  revisionists and learned A.G.A.

Revisionists Sita Ram, Ram Pal and Chhetar Singh were convicted by order dated 5.9.1984 to undergo sentence of three months R.I. and Rs. 200/- as fine under Section 323 I.P.C. and six months R.I. and Rs. 500/- fine under Section 452 I.P.C. The appeal against the said judgement was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad by order dated 18.2.1985.

The learned counsel for the  revisionists has not  made any submission on the merit of the case but has advanced argument only about the quantum of the sentence.  The matter relates to the year 1982 and sentence was passed in 1984.  More than 22 years  have elapsed since then.  The offence is also of trivial nature.

Considering this, the revision is dismissed and conviction under section 323 I.P.C and section 452 I.P.C. is maintained.  The sentence is, however, modified and in place of imprisonment, the revisionists shall pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for the above sentences out of which,  Rs. 6000/- shall be paid to injured Yeshpal, Bhopal and Smt. Sankariya at the rate of Rs. 2000/- each and  remaining Rs 4000/- shall be deposited  in favour of State.

During  the pendency of this revision,  revisionists Sita Ram and Chhetar Singh have  died, hence Rs. 10,000/- amount of fine shall be paid by the revisionist Rampal within 45 days from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.  In case of default  revisionist Rampal shall undergo simple imprisonment of six months.

Dt.  10.  11.2005.



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.