High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Smt. Manju Tripathi & Another v. Vice Chairman Allahabad Development Authority & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 22452 of 2003  RD-AH 623 (3 March 2005)
Hon'ble Amitava Lala,J
Hon'ble Sanjay Misra,J.
The petitioners are aggrieved by not getting allotment of MIG plot Nos. 122 and 123 Naini Awasiya Yojana. From the prescribed rules, we find that either by way of lottery or by way of "first come first serve policy" will have to be adopted. The petitioners' case is pending for quite some time and according to them they made these applications at first as under Annexure Nos. 3 & 4. However, learned counsel appearing for the respondents contended that it has to be distributed by way of lottery, to which the petitioners objected by saying that the lottery system was not applicable when the application was made. We are of the view that such dispute can not be resolved unless and until it has been taken into account by appropriate authority, the respondent no.1 herein, to pass a reasoned order upon giving fullest opportunity of hearing. At the time of consideration the authority concerned first decide that the petitioners' case comes under which category and then to decide expeditiously if possible not beyond the period of two months from the date of communication of this order. At the time of consideration it is also to be clarified by the authority concerned to the petitioners whether any of the plot was allotted to the third party and what way the same has been allotted in respect of the petitioners grievance long back. With these observations this writ petition stands disposed of. No order is passed as to cost.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.