Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER versus LABOUR COURT, AGRA AND ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


State Of U.P. And Another v. Labour Court, Agra And Another - WRIT - C No. 28517 of 1997 [2005] RD-AH 6367 (24 November 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO.31

CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO.28517 OF 1997

State of U.P. and another                                  ...Petitioner

Versus

Labour Court, U.P. Agra and another              ...Respondents

---------  

Hon'ble Bharati Sapru, J.

The present petition has been filed against an award of the Labour Court dated 1.8.96 passed in adjudication case No.157 of 1994.  By this award, the Labour Court has reinstated the workman after reaching a categorical finding that in fact the workman had put in more than 240 days of work and his services were terminated without due compliance of the provisions of Section 6 N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

I have heard learned Standing Counsel at length and I have also perused the record.  The award records a clear finding of fact, which has not been specifically challenged by the petitioner.  Having gone through the record of the case,

I am of the opinion that the Labour Court has correctly come to the conclusion that the respondent workman had put in more than 240 days of hearing and that his services had been wrongly terminated.  The award of the Labour Court, therefore, calls for no interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.  The award of the Labour Court dated 1.8.96 passed in adjudication case No.157 of 1994 is hereby upheld.  The petitioner shall comply with the award and give to the respondent workman all the benefit that flow from the award.

The writ petition is devoid of merits and is, hereby, dismissed.  

Dated : 24/11/05

L.F.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.