Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJAN @ RAJJAN SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajan @ Rajjan Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 11833 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 6431 (25 November 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble R.C.Deepak, J.  

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

It has vehemently been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that although the petitioner was named in the FIR but the investigating officer exonerated him. He has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to face the trial. His submission is that four witnesses have been examined including the informant Daya Ram, Lekhpal. Their evidence do not guarantee that the conviction of the petitioner be recorded. Therefore, the summoning order is bad in law.

I have perused the FIR and the statements of the witnesses so recorded. The petitioner is not a stranger. He was named as an accused. Why he was exonerated, the reason best known to the investigation but so far   as the spirit of Section 319 Cr.P.C. is concerned, there is sufficient evidence to summon him.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any merit in the petition.

The petition stands dismissed.

However, in the event the petitioner puts in his appearance before the court below and makes an   application for bail in Criminal Case no. 1150 of 2002, his bail application shall be disposed of as expeditiously as may be convenient in accordance with law as the person who have been charge sheeted, have already been released on bail. The trial court is hereby directed to proceed expeditiously with the trial and conclude the same within a period of  six months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of the order,

Dt/- 25th November, 2005  

PKG/5A (11833/05)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.