Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

UNION OF INDIDA AND OTHERS versus RAM BACHAN SINGH AND ANOHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Union Of Indida And Others v. Ram Bachan Singh And Anoher - WRIT - A No. 73851 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 6948 (5 December 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

This petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.4.2005 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad.

Respondent No.1 Ram Bachan Singh had filed Original Application No. 1216 of 2001 before the aforesaid Tribunal for setting aside the order dated 17.10.2001 passed by the Appellate Authority by which his request for correction of the date of birth was rejected. From the records it transpires that the date of birth of the applicant/respondent No.1 was recorded as 1.11.1943 in the Service Book when the applicant joined the Organization in 1962. Subsequently the said date was struck off in the Service Book in red ink and substituted by 1.11.1941. The Tribunal by the impugned judgment and order has recorded a categorical finding of fact that the date of birth of the applicant was recorded as 1.11.1943 in the High School Certificate issued by the U.P. Board and so there was no doubt that the date of birth of the applicant was 1.11.1943, which had been recorded in the Service Book at the time when the applicant joined the service.

We have carefully perused the judgment under challenge and heard Sri K.C. Sinha, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India and have examined the other materials available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to point out as to why the date of birth, which was initially recorded as 1.11.1943 in the Service Book was deleted with red ink without any signatures and was substituted by 1.11.1941 particularly when the date of birth entered in the High School Certificate was 1.11.1943.

Such being the position, there is no infirmity in the judgment and order of the Tribunal. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Dt/- 5.12.2005

Sharma/73851


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.