Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ASHOK KUMAR & OTHERS versus CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH AT ALLAHABAD & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ashok Kumar & Others v. Central Administrative Tribunal Bench At Allahabad & Others - WRIT - A No. 27627 of 2001 [2005] RD-AH 7221 (9 December 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

Sri Ashok Kumar Upadhyaya has sent illness slip though there are three more counsel in the case. The other three have not sent illness slip. Even when the petition was listed earlier on 17.11.2004 and 2.12.2004 illness slip was sent. We have, therefore, examined the petition and have heard Sri Rizvan Ali Akhtar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

This writ petition has been filed against the judgment and order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 26.5.2000 by which the application of the petitioners for seeking employment on compassionate ground has been rejected. The father of petitioner No.1 died in 1986. His claim for compassionate appointment was rejected in 1993. Being aggrieved, he approached the Tribunal and the Tribunal has rejected his claim on the ground that the other two brothers of petitioner No.1 were already in Government service but inspite of that his case was considered under the 5% quota fixed offering appointments on compassionate ground to the dependent of the deceased who died in harness. However, as the quota is limited and applicants are more, the inter se merit list was prepared of all the candidates where petitioner No.1 could not get the chance of appointment.

We do not see any cogent reason to interfere with the well-reasoned judgment and order of the Tribunal. Hence the writ petition is dismissed.

Dt/- 9.12.2005

Sharma/27627


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.