High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Shaktidhar Pandey v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy., Revenue, Govt. Of U.P. Lkw. & Ors - WRIT - C No. 74305 of 2005  RD-AH 7787 (19 December 2005)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J
A lease deed was executed in favour of the petitioner on 10.4.2003 for a period of three years. This was from 1.4.2003 till 31.3.2006. The petitioner filed an application on 21.9.2004 before the respondent no. 4 for canceling his lease deed. No orders have been passed on this application, hence the present writ petition.
We have heard the counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents.
In the circumstances of the case it would be appropriate that the petitioner's application dated 21.9.2004 may be decided by the concerned authority by a reasoned order at an early date, and if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner alongwith certified copy of this order will also file a copy of his aforesaid representation, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelop. The concerned respondent after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. In case the authority concerned comes to the conclusion that some relief is to be granted on account of passing of order on the application dated 21.9.2004 then the adjustment will be made from the recovery.
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.