Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAKTIDHAR PANDEY versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECY., REVENUE, GOVT. OF U.P. LKW. & ORS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shaktidhar Pandey v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy., Revenue, Govt. Of U.P. Lkw. & Ors - WRIT - C No. 74305 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 7787 (19 December 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble  Yatindra Singh,J

Hon'ble  R.K.Rastogi,J

A lease deed was executed in favour of the petitioner  on 10.4.2003 for a period of three years. This was  from 1.4.2003 till 31.3.2006. The petitioner filed an application on 21.9.2004 before the respondent no. 4 for canceling  his lease deed. No orders have been passed  on this application, hence the present writ petition.

We have heard   the  counsel for the petitioner and  Standing Counsel for the            respondents.

In the circumstances of the case it would be  appropriate  that the petitioner's application  dated 21.9.2004 may be decided  by the concerned authority by a reasoned order at an early date, and if possible, within three months  from the date of receipt of  certified copy of this order. The petitioner  alongwith certified copy of  this order  will also file a copy of his aforesaid  representation, other necessary  documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelop. The concerned  respondent after taking  decision will  communicate the same to the petitioner.

Till the representation of the petitioner  is  decided, the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. In case the  authority concerned  comes to the conclusion  that some relief  is to be granted  on account of passing of   order on the application  dated 21.9.2004 then  the adjustment will be made  from the recovery.

With these observations the writ petition is  disposed of.

19.12.2005

MLK

WP 74305/05


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.