Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Kishan v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 23392 of 2005 [2005] RD-AH 7858 (20 December 2005)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court No. 19

Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.23392 of 2005

Kishan .....Vs.....State of U.P.


Hon'ble Alok Kumar Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and also perused the material on record.

The applicant Kishan is involved in case crime No. 2399 of 2005, for the offence under Sections 386, 342, I.P.C., Police Station Katghar, district Moradabad.

It is alleged  that a tractor  belonging  to complainant's brother disappeared  due to conspiracy made by Doctor Mohan resident  of Mau, Police Station Hajrat Nagar Garhi, district Moradabad . The case was got registered  by the complainant. Due to that enmity while complainant was coming  to Moradabad  on his Motor Cycle along with his companion Jarif at about 11.00 a.m., Doctor Mohan his nephew Kishan and his elder brother Mahendra stopped  his Motor Cycle  and took him to another place where Doctor Mohan threatened him by placing his country made pistol in front of him and demanded  an amount of Rs. 1 lac. The complainant accepted the demand under pressure and thereafter all of them went towards Chandausi. Consequently report was lodged.

As against the genuineness  of the prosecution case and proposed  supporting evidence, it is argued  that at the most  offence under Section 342 I.P.C. is made out  against the applicant which is a minor offence.  The offence under Section 386 I.P.C. is not made out even on the basis of allegations and prima face evidence. It is further argued that the enmity is a double edged  weapon and he has been falsely implicated.   It is contended out that applicant has no criminal history against his credit.

The bail is, however, opposed by the learned A.G.A.

The points pertaining to nature of accusation, severity of punishment, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses, prima facie satisfaction of the Court  regarding  proposed evidence and genuineness of the prosecution  case were duly considered.

 In view of the entire facts and circumstances of the case, taking into  consideration some of the arguments, advanced on behalf of the applicant in respect of the points discussed herein above, without prejudice to the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court.  

 Dt. 20.12.2005.



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.