Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THE COMMISSIONER TRADE TAX,U.P. LUCKNOW. versus S/S BANK CHEM. DRUGS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. GHAZIABAD

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


The Commissioner Trade Tax,U.P. Lucknow. v. S/S Bank Chem. Drugs International Pvt. Ltd. Ghaziabad - SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION DEFECTIVE No. 200 of 1998 [2005] RD-AH 798 (18 March 2005)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO.55

TRADE TAX REVISION NO.200 (Defective) OF 1998

The Commissioner, Trade Tax, U.P., Lucknow          Applicant

Versus

S/S Bank Chem Drugs International Pvt.Ltd, Ghaziabad.    .Opp.party

Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.

Present revision under Section 11 of U.P. Trade Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "Act") is directed against the order of Tribunal dated 23rd September, 1997.relating to the assessment year 1992-1993.

Dealer/opposite party (hereinafter referred to as "Dealer") sold medicine in the name of waxcillin which is claimed to be Ampicillin capsule and claimed exemption under Notification No. ST-II-1217/XI-9 (94)/91-U.P. Act 15/48-Order-92, dated 31.03.1992.being a Life Saving Drugs. Tribunal held that Waxcillin contains an Ampicillin Trihydrate which is equivalent to Ampicillin 250 mg and therefore, covered in the item no. 26 namely Ampicillin of the Life Saving Drugs which is mentioned at serial no.4 of the aforesaid Notification No. ST-II-1217/XI-9 (94)/91-U.P. Act 15/48-Order-92, dated 31.03.1992.

Learned Standing Counsel is not able to show anything to the contrary as held by the Tribunal. Similar issue is also covered by the Division Bench decision in the case of M/S Mercury Laboratories Pvt. Ltd Versus State of U.P. reported in 2000 UPTC, 82.

In the result, revision fails and is accordingly, dismissed.

Dated. 18.03.2005.

VS.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.