High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Kamal Ahmad v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Power & Energy & Ors. - WRIT - C No. 25909 of 2005  RD-AH 953 (4 April 2005)
WP NO. 25909 OF 2005
HON'BLE YATINDRA SINGH, J
HON'BLE R.K. RASTOGI, J.
1. Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri WH Khan and the standing counsel for respondents. According to the petitioner he has done some work for the respondents yet no payment has been made. He has also given a representation dated 16.8.2003 before respondent no. 4. As it has not been decided, he has filed the present writ petition.
2. In the circumstances of the case it would be appropriate that the petitioners' representations dated 16.8.2003 may be decided by respondent no 4 by a reasoned order at an early date, and if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioners alongwith certified copy of this order will also file a copy of his aforesaid representation, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope. Respondent no 4 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioners.
3. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.