DR. AJAY PANDEY AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Dr. Ajay Pandey And Another v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 28582 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 10061 (23 May 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J.

This writ petition has been filed for a direction upon the Chief Medical Officer, Jaunpur, to register the names of the petitioners as medical practitioners pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in Contempt Petition. From the records, we find that the petitioners have submitted a joint application on 18/4/2006 before the Chief Medical Officer, Jaunpur.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to satisfy us as to how the joint application for registration is maintainable. He however contends that the petitioners shall now file separate application before the Chief Medical Officer, Jaunpur annexing therein all the relevant documents so as to enable the Chief Medical Officer, Jaunpur to ascertain whether they can be registered pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in the Contempt Petition.

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents has stated that in case the petitioners file separate applications along with the relevant document before the Chief Medical Officer, Jaunpur then he shall examine the same and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned Standing Counsel, we dispose of this petition with a direction that in the event the petitioners file separate applications for registration before the Chief Medical Officer, Jaunpur annexing thereof all the relevant documents, degrees and certificates obtained by them for indulging in medical practice, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and appropriate orders shall be passed expeditiously.      

23/5/2006

SB-28582-06

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.