Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DR.RAMESH CHANDRA AND ANOTHER versus U.P.AVAS EVAM VIKASH PARISHAD AND ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dr.Ramesh Chandra And Another v. U.P.Avas Evam Vikash Parishad And Another - WRIT - C No. 44923 of 2000 [2006] RD-AH 10064 (23 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

WP No. 44923 of 2000

HON'BLE YATINDRA SINGH, J

HON'BLE R.K. RASTOGI, J

1. The petitioners were allotted plots no. A-293 and  A-292 of area 40.74 sq. metres. According to them they paid entire money for the same. However, these plots could not be given to them and subsequently different plot namely plots no. 8311/4 and 8311/3 have been allotted to them and they have been asked to deposit extra money for the same. Hence the present writ petition.

2. We have heard counsel for petitioners and standing counsel and the standing counsel for the respondent. According to the petitioners they had already deposited the entire money and possession could not be given due to fault of the respondents and as such respondent ought to have adjusted the interest over the money which has been deposited by them.

3. In the circumstances of the case, the petitioners may file a representation before respondent no. 2.  In case the representation is filed, it may be decided by respondent no.2 by a speaking order, if possible, within three  months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioners will file a certified copy of this order; other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with their representation.  Respondent no. 2 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioners.

4. With these directions the writ petition is disposed of.  

Date: 23.5.2006

BBL


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.