Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAMESH KUMAR versus SECRETARY, U.P. MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA SEWA CHAYAN B. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ramesh Kumar v. Secretary, U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Sewa Chayan B. & Another - WRIT - A No. 29478 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 10359 (25 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Tarun Agarwala,J.

The petitioner is a selected candidate and was recommended by the Board to join the institution concerned but was not allowed to join. The District Inspector of Schools in his letter has stated that there is no vacancy in the institution concerned.

On the other hand Sri A.K.Yadav, the learned counsel for the Selection Board has submitted, on the instructions received from the Selection Board, that the vacancy was notified by the Management and duly verified by the District Inspector of Schools and thereafter intimated to the Board. Therefore, there is no error on the part of the Selection Board in recommending the name of the petitioner in the institution concerned.

In view of the aforesaid, I direct the Director of Secondary Education to make an inquiry under Section 17 of the U.P. Secondary Education (Service Selection Board) Act, 1982, and pass an order within one month from the date of the receipt of the certified copy of this order. In the event the Director of Education  finds that a vacancy exists in the institution, he will ensure compliance of the order of the Board. In the event the Director finds that no vacancy exists in the institution, he will intimate the Selection Board and the Board in turn will pass a fresh order within two weeks thereafter allocating another institution in favour of the petitioner for his appointment.

The writ petition is disposed  of in terms of the aforesaid direction.

Dated:25.5.2006

AKJ(WP 29478/06)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.