Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DEEPAK versus STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Deepak v. State Of U.P. & Another - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 6889 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 10432 (26 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.

Hon'ble Amar Saran, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.

It is contended that this notice is not in accordance with law as general nature of material allegations are missing in the notice and only crime number and sections are mentioned in the notice dated 31.3.2006.

Learned A.G.A. is granted three weeks' time to file counter affidavit.

List in the month of July, 2006.

Till the next date of listing the impugned notice dated 31.3.2006 issued under Section 3(1) of Control of Goondas Act, 1970 shall remain stayed.

However, it is open for the District Magistrate concerned to issue fresh notice in accordance with law.

Dated : 26.5.2006

S.B.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.