Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GOLIA @ ROOKAM PAL versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Golia @ Rookam Pal v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 6550 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 10443 (26 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Golia alias Rookam Pal involved in case Crime No.  193 of 2005 under sections 364, 368, 120-B, I.P.C., Police station Baldev, district Mathura.

Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that all the co-accused have been granted bail by this Court by various orders and the case of the applicant is analogous to the co-accused Jagdish, Ram Prakash and Tilla. The learned counsel submitted that the abducted person is said to have been kept in the house of the applicant for a period of 8-10 days.

The learned AGA submitted that the applicant had confined the abducted person at his residence.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

Co-accused Jagdish, Ram Prakash and  Tilla have been enlarged on bail by orders of this Court  annexed with the rejoinder affidavit as Annexures RA-1 to RA-7. The case of the applicant is similar  to that of the co-accused. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Golia alias Rookam Pal involved in case Crime No.  193 of 2005 under sections 364, 368, 120-B, I.P.C., Police station Baldev, district Mathura, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/-26.5.2006

Mahmood-6550-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.