Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BECHEY versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Bechey v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 11483 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 10645 (15 June 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Bechey involved in case Crime No. 8 of 2006 under sections 147, 148, 149, 302 I.P.C. and section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police station Aliganj, district Bareilly.

Heard Sri Kamlesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel submitted that in the first information report the role of catching hold of the victim has been assigned to the applicant. The learned counsel submitted that informant in his statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. has assigned the same role to the applicant. The learned counsel argued that the witness Ram Singh for the first time disclosed that the applicant has opened fire at the victim.

The learned AGA submitted that the applicant was present at the spot with firearm and caught hold of the victim.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

In the first information report as well as in the statement of the informant the role of catching hold of the victim has been assigned to the applicant. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Bechey involved in case Crime No. 8 of 2006 under sections 147, 148, 149, 302 I.P.C. and section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police station Aliganj, district Bareilly, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

D/-15.6.2006

Mahmood-11483-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.