High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Narain Alias Narendra Kori v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3519 of 2006  RD-AH 10796 (3 July 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Vinod Prasad, J.
Summon the trial court record within a period of four weeks.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have perused the impugned judgment also.
It is contended that the appellant has been assigned the role of exhortation to his associates Devphal and Kaluwa who are said to have killed Amarnath. It is also contended that the appellant did not play any active role in commission of the crime. It is also pointed out that the appellant was on bail during trial and he did not misuse the liberty allowed to him.
Considering all facts and circumstances of the case as well as this fact that the appeal is not going to be heard on merit in near future, we find it appropriate to enlarge the appellant on bail during pendency of appeal.
Let the appellant-Narain alias Narendra Kori be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Banda in S.T. No. 75 of 2005 (case crime no. 208/04) State Vs. Narain alias Narendra Kori and others provided the appellant deposits the entire amount of fine in the court below within a period of one month from today.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate will send photocopies of the bail bonds to this Court immediately after its acceptance.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.