Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJ KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Raj Kumar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20138 of 2005 [2006] RD-AH 10892 (4 July 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

The bail applications no. 20138 and 18821 of 2005 in case crime no 95 of 2005 under sections 376, 306, 342, 201, 120-B I.P.C. P.S. Sikandara  District Agra  moved on behalf of  applicants Raj Kumar and Hari Om respectively are being decided by a common order.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The applicants and co-accused are said to have committed gang rape on informant's minor daughter aged about seventeen years. The victim committed suicide the same day out of shame. The incident took place on 23.2.2005. The First Information Report was made on 24.3.2005.

The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that victim is said to have narrated the incident to Smt. Chhena. The learned counsel argued that Smt. Chhena has denied in her statement before the court that the victim made a disclosure  about the incident to her.

The learned A.G.A. argued that applicants took away the minor daughter of informant to Laha field on some pretext and committed gang rape on her.  

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The witness Smt. Chhena to whom the victim is said to have narrated the incident resiled   from her previous statement before the trial court and has been declared hostile. There is no evidence of commission of rape. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicants Raj Kumar and Hari Om     indicted in case crime no. 95 of 2005 under sections 376, 306, 342, 201, 120-B I.P.C. P.S. Sikandara District Agra be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/20138/18821/05

4.7.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.