High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Rashid v. State Of U.P. And Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 788 of 2005  RD-AH 10906 (4 July 2006)
The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. The stolen property was not recovered from his custody. Three other persons are named in the F.I.R. who were charge-sheeted in the year 1992. The investigation against the petitioner is not yet completed from the year 1991. Hence, the formal order is passed.
We direct the Investigating Officer to complete the investigation of Case Crime No.904 of 1991, under Sections 392 and 411 I.P.C., P.S. Sector-20, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar within a period of three months from the date, on which a certified copy of this order is presented before him. The petitioner/s is/are directed to co-operate with the Investigating Officer in all possible manner. If the Investigating Officer or informant found himself aggrieved due to falsification, misstatement, fraud, non-cooperation with the Investigating Officer or any other reasons whatsoever relevant for the purpose, they are at liberty to apply for recalling/variation/vacating/modification of the order.
However, the petitioner/s will not be arrested in the aforesaid case crime number till the submission of charge-sheet/final report, if any.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
However, no order is passed as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.