Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KARAN PAL SINGH SENGAR versus STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Karan Pal Singh Sengar v. State Of U.P. & Another - CRIMINAL REVISION No. 195 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 1103 (17 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. and Sri R.P.S. Rathor learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

This application is filed by the revisionist Karan Pal Singh Sengar against the order dated 2.1.2006 passed by the learned A. C.J.M.,  Court No. 17, Etah in Criminal Misc Case No. 26 of 2005 whereby the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.  was allowed  and the S.O. concerned was directed to register a case and investigate the same.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the revisionist that the impugned order is illegal which has not been passed in accordance with the provision of law.

It is opposed by the learned A.G.A. by submitting that there is no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order because from the perusal of the allegations made in the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. prima facie cognizable offence is made out against the revisionist.. The order is well reasoned and prefect

From the perusal of the application under Section 156(3)  it appears that on the basis of the allegation made therein prima facie cognizable offence is made out against the revisionist and the allegations are of such nature which requires investigation by the police. Therefore, there is no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. The prayer for quashing the impugned order is refused.

It is further contended that the revisionist is man of peace loving. The allegations made against him are not of grave in nature. In case he is arrested and sent to jail during the investigation of the case registered against him, he shall suffer for irreparable loss.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. and the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 it is directed that the revisionist shall not be arrested during the pendency of the investigation of the case registered in pursuance of the above mentioned impugned order, but he shall co-operate with the case and  will not tamper with the evidence.

With this observation the application is finally disposed of.

Dt:17. 1.2006

Rcv-195-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.